Style of "Flower in the Gun"

The style of photograph "Flower in the Gun" displays the mismatch between military officials and war protesters during the 1960s. An important element to analyze is the angle of the photograph. The angle displays an overwhelming presence of soldiers compared to one lone female protester. Soldiers, armed with bayonets, extend in a straight line all the way throughout the photograph. In comparison to the large number of soldiers, the photograph shows a single protester. The photograph displays a distinct difference in numbers between the military and protesters. Protesters are at a clear disadvantage to promote peace. Another element for style is hue. The soldiers are wearing black uniforms and holding black rifles, in contrast the female protester is wearing colorful clothing and holding a flower. War protesters in the 1960s used colorful clothing to symbolize peace and serenity of the movement. Vibrant colors for everyday items like clothing were based off of the colors of flowers. While the colors of protesters represented peace, the colors of the soldiers represent death and despair. Death is an obvious mismatch to peace. Combining angle and hue, death overwhelms peace in the photograph. Through elements of the photograph there is a clear mismatch of ideals and symbolism between protesters and military personal.

Establishing Ethos for "Flower in the Gun"

The photographer, Marc Riboud, has a long history in journalism. He has many experiences photographing all over the world. He traveled through both North and South Vietnam.  The photograph he takes is published in many publications worldwide. His vast wealth of experience and international appeal give him extrinsic ethos. He is trusted to be a honest photographer. He is trusted to not stage the photograph. This trust makes the image seem more genuine and real. The only problem the photograph has with establishing ethos is that it only shows one view. It could have been framed to promote the photographer's bias. The photograph shows only one of the many protestors and a line of soldiers. This unfair view of the soldiers hurts the general public's respect for the photographer and hinders its effect outside of antiwar protestors.

Logos of "Masters of War"

           As stated in our post about the ethos of “Masters of War,” people knew Bob Dylan as a rebellious soul. Unsurprisingly, in “Masters of War” he went against “the man” and criticized America’s involvement in Vietnam. With Dylan’s reputation as a protestor in mind, one can clearly identify his logical argument of the song. Dylan argued that the politicians, the “masters,” responsible for the fighting in Vietnam caused great amounts violence and death, unaware and apathetic to the true effects of their actions. He supports his belief of the masters’ indifference through the lyrics, “You fasten the triggers for the others to fire. Then you set back and watch when the death count gets higher. You hide in your mansion as young people’s blood, flows out of their bodies and is buried in mud.” These words show that the politicians did not care about the rising death toll in Vietnam; as long as they could hide from the violence, they were content. He also asserts his belief that the government officials did not care about the lives of the soldiers through the lyrics, “You play with my world like it’s your little toy.” The comparison of Bob’s life to a toy demonstrates how the politicians did not take their actions seriously. In addition, Bob Dylan strengthens his argument further by appealing to logos through the use of allusions. For example, he states, “But there’s one thing I know, though I’m younger than you. Even Jesus would never forgive what you do.” 
By inserting this widely historical/religious figure, Dylan makes use of an assumption that almost everyone understands. Therefore, the audience can use previous knowledge about Jesus to make the conclusion that the actions of the masters of war were so heinous that even the One known for loving all people could never forgive the politicians’ deeds. Although Dylan makes a stronger appeal to pathos in his song, “Masters of War” has elements of logos that help the audience form an opinion, perhaps one similar to that of the writer’s.

Style of Masters of War

In the live version of “Masters of War”, Bob Dylan usually starts out with a guitar intro and talks to the audience. He tells them how “some people see this song…as very naive” but he doesn't care because he hopes that the real-life masters of war die. The fact that he takes the time to address his position and defend his beliefs from any critics is significant because it shows how Dylan was determined to spread his message no matter what people thought of the song. He contrasts the violence and horror of the lyrics with the peaceful quality of his voice. Only Dylan could sing about blood running into the mud or watching the masters of war being lowered into their graves and still keep up the folk music quality of the song. The contrast between what he is saying and the calming effects of his voice and guitar chords creates an interesting juxtaposition. It calls attention to the severe contrast between violent words and peaceful music. There were critics that argued that Dylan didn't have a powerful singing voice, but the lyrics more than make up for what his vocal chords lack. Professionals have argued that what Dylan says is more important than how he sounds, making him more of a poet than a musician. He left behind a lasting legacy of powerful words and opinions that added to a movement determined to bring peace to the world.

Emotions and Flowers

The photograph of the flower in the gun relies on an emotional appeal to relay the message of peace. The innocence of the young women clashes with the seriousness of the soldiers. In the face of danger the women isn't afraid and offers peace. The women represents the anti-war movement as a whole within the picture. The angle of the photograph portrays one lone women against a large group of soldiers. The angle creates the sense that the soldiers are ganging up against one innocent women who is protesting peacefully.This mismatch between the women and soldiers shows the passion of the anti-war movement against the government. The contrast in colors within the photograph emphasizes the mismatch of the soldiers and the women. The soldiers are wearing all dark clothing and holding black rifles, whereas the women is wearing colorful clothing and holding a flower. Dark colors represent evil and bright colors represent good. Soldiers are made out as evil and the women is made out to be good. The photograph brings out the classic emotional battle between good and evil. The strong emotional response to the mismatch within the photograph created support for anti-war movement.

It's Simply Logical: the Logos in the Flower in the Gun

While the message the photographer was trying to get across was mostly emotional, there is still an appeal to reason.  The photograph is framed to show more guards than protestors. This makes it so the police presence seems disproportionately large. The photographer is trying to assert that the government is overreacting to the peaceful protestors and trying to stifle the antiwar movement. It is not reasonable to point rifles at someone with a flower. He is trying to show that the soldiers and the war they represent are simply illogical and should be stopped.

Bob Dylan's Appeal to Pathos

           Throughout the 1960s, Bob Dylan had a reputation of being a rebellious soul, often objecting to societal norms and governmental policies. He created this disobedient status through the writing of multiple protest songs. In the lyrics of his music, Dylan wove in many pathetic appeals that helped convince listeners to accept his point of view. Specifically, the piece “Masters of War” has multiple uses of imagery, analogies, and concrete language that help Bob Dylan make an appeal to the emotions of his audience.

            First, Bob Dylan uses multiple images throughout the song to provide vivid scenes in the mind of the listeners. For example, he sings, “You hide in your mansion, as young people’s blood flows out of their bodies and is buried in the mud.” Here, Dylan’s lyrics evoke the picture of a young man at war in Vietnam dying a gruesome death while the people who sent him to war sit comfortably in their houses of luxury. The image of the blood of the soldier flowing into the mud gives the listeners an idea of the atrocities that happened in Vietnam. This idea prompted Dylan’s audience to feel empathetic toward the soldiers, the victims, and hostile toward the politicians, the villains.

            Second, Dylan placed analogies throughout “Masters of War,” that help convince the audience to accept his viewpoint and protest the violence of the 1960s, particularly the Vietnam War. Specifically, Bob sang, “Like Judas of old, you lie and deceive. A world war can be won you want me to believe.” Dylan made his appeal to pathos by traitor Judas. He wanted the listeners to feel betrayed by the government, hopefully leading them to question why America was in Vietnam.

comparing the masters of war (the politicians in Washington) to the

            Third, Bob Dylan used concrete language to stir feelings of negativity and disgust within his listeners. Take, for example, the lyrics, “You put a gun in my hand and you hide from my eyes. And you turn and run farther, when the fast bullets fly.” One can picture a young man, inexperienced and afraid, thrown into active combat as the “masters of war” run away, not wanting to witness the damage that they are causing. The language that Dylan used attempted to lead his listeners to feel ashamed of the American leaders’ careless actions. He wanted his audience to realize that the politicians were sending unskilled young men to an early death.

            Throughout “Masters of War,” Bob Dylan used charged language in order to make his appeals

to pathos. The lyrics of the song helped conjure feelings of empathy, distrust, and anger within his audience, effectively making his pathetic appeal.